One striking thing about "conservative" (read "anarcho-Leninist") discourse is the complete lack of rationality. Some of this is a financially self-interested falling in behind the Party Line of the day, but a lot of it seems to be a broader incapacity to reason. This deficit (which exists in some degree among all human beings) goes beyond simple emotionalism, although that plays its role in shutting down dialogue. It's very hard to listen to someone else if "traitor!" or "thug!" is the tune playing on the limbic jukebox.
Consider the following,
Protox, posting at William Arkin's blog; the post is not clearly identifiable as left or right:
"Why do you casually assert that the risk of a hurricane is more likely than the risk of a WMD or Terrorist attack? There is simply no genuine empirical evidence to support that assertion. "
This is one of those statements, like "Of course this planet is Mars, dummy!" that could serve as a substitute for curare. It sounds intelligent. With one minor error in capitalization, the spelling, grammar and punctuation resemble English. But, for reasons that do not require explanation to the MercuryRising readership, it makes absolutely no sense.
Arkin's blog has become magnet for such totally inane posts, including a number that
are identifiably from the right. I've collated some of the things these guys say, traced them to a ring of websites that appear to
* pretend to be moderates independent of the Republican machine
* act as enforcers against Republicans and others who exhibit insufficient enthusiasm for anarcho-Leninism and
* act as a far more polished conduit of the morning FAX than Mr. Oxycontin can deliver nowadays
I'm no mindreader. But it smells like Astroturf to me.
(continues in comments)
# posted by
Charles @ 9/30/2005 11:16:00 AM