Monday, September 04, 2006
Evidence of fraud
Image from Weisbrot, Sandoval and Paredes-Drouet, An Analysis of Discrepancies in the Mexican Presidential Election Results.
Random processes follow a Bell Curve.
The ballot count, even by the Election Institute's own numbers doesn't.
Only a bit more than half the precincts could make the ballots issued match the votes plus surplus ballots.
Over 86,000 ballots are missing. Even if one counts only the precincts where three or more ballots are missing, that is 62,811 ballots. Over 56,000 ballots have mysteriously appeared, of which 41,000 represent errors of 3 or more ballots per precinct.
This represents an error rate of 0.3% on an election decided by not much more than that. Washington State says its recounts show a variation of only 1 vote in 10,000.
And this is without going into the issues of open ballot packets, etc.
The evidence of fraud?
That the Elections Court has refused to make public all the data and the media have gone along. The non-Gaussian distribution of errors, well...that too, of which perhaps more later.Michael Collins guest blogging at BradBlog rips shit up with a slew of facts that bring us to that conclusion rather comfortably.
And I'm happy I could offer something valuable to you.
But not writing it only hands Calderón a victory, so I did. I really do not know where this will all lead too now if AMLO does go through with the creation of the parallel government. They are already talking about drafting up a new constitution.
And even remembering that night, when all the tallies started changing mysteriously (Kerry v Bush) makes my gut begin to smoke. I was text messaging my girl the totals, she was at work on the nightshift, and at one point I was like I'm going to bed now, and when I woke up the next day, I was inside of a nightmare.
But we can endure, can refuse to forget, can refuse get turned around, can remember the people who are so much less powerless than we, and can try to give them voice.
Some guy over at Bradblog is trying to say that AMLO shouldn't protest because the Mexican government might kill people and the US might invade.
Now, if you can't protest because you fear you might get killed by your own government or the country next door, what kind of freedom is that?
I reminded him that people were telling Martin Luther King something similar when he was in Birmingham jail.
<< Home
More blogs about politics.







