Saturday, November 11, 2006

 

Mexico, November 11th

The main action continues to be in Oaxaca. Basically, there's a cynical game of spinning out the rest on November, after which the governor Ulises Ruiz Ortiz will abdicate in favor of some crony. That will allow PRI to hold the governorship until the end of URO's ...um...elected term. The governor promises a cabinet shake-up. The APPO protestors say this will not satisfice. For once, PAN and PRD apparently agree. René Trujillo, Horacio Marmolejo and Benito Pereda Fernández have testified that theu were kidnapped and, over the course of a 46 hour ordeal, tortured by the AFI to extract information related to APPO personalities Flavio Sosa, Dr. Bertha Muñoz and-- interestingly-- three minors. Flashpoints has an interview with John Gibler. He says that the marches are huge, above 100,000, that there has been "low intensity psychological terror, gunmen shooting at barricades" and "cases of disappearances." He says that the three men kidnapped were pistol-whipped, hooded, and tortured for 9 hours. See also this piece by Gibler Laura Carlson has a good piece in FPIF: Oaxaca's rebellion also has roots in the battles of the indigenous communities for autonomy and, since the 1970s, for the restoration of communitarian forms of self-government, collective work, and identity. Added to the mix has been the anger of a new generation of high school and university students sick of getting short shrift from governments impoverished by structural adjustment and corruption. And as a final ingredient in a recipe for rebellion, citizens sensitized to the injustice expressed in daily life rose up against a disputed gubernatorial election that seemed to doom their society to more of the same or worse. Nancy Davies of NarcoNews says that PRI is jamming radio stations, that the university station has been deliberately damaged by gunfire to reduce its broadcast range, but that there has been a compensating explosion of media coverage that corrects false impressions created by corporate media. Laura Carlson has a good piece in FPIF: Oaxaca's rebellion also has roots in the battles of the indigenous communities for autonomy and, since the 1970s, for the restoration of communitarian forms of self-government, collective work, and identity. Added to the mix has been the anger of a new generation of high school and university students sick of getting short shrift from governments impoverished by structural adjustment and corruption. And as a final ingredient in a recipe for rebellion, citizens sensitized to the injustice expressed in daily life rose up against a disputed gubernatorial election that seemed to doom their society to more of the same or worse. Proceso also has an article that explains APPO's broad base. Joel Ortega, the head of DF security claimed that the vicious 2004 murder of two federal police officers was committed by a guerrilla group called EPR in Tlahuac. This would be more impressive if they were naming suspects or otherwise doing something specific. The EPR is suspected of recent bombings for which five other groups have claimed responsibility. One interesting tidbit: the EPR was formed in response to a government massacre of peasants in Guerrero. One of our commenters, Manuel, wanted to bring to my attention the possibility that freelance photographer Brad Will might have been more than a journalist like, say, a guerrilla. In support of that, he provided the following photo. I have no idea where the photo is from nor what it really shows. I'm not even positive that it shows Brad Will, since all the photos of Brad Will I have seen show him with a beard; photos from the shooting don't show his face clearly so he could have shaved. But I am certainly willing to discuss it. Added: The photo below is of Brad Will being borne away from the site of his shooting. My position is that as long as Brad Will's attackers were not acting as law enforcement officials and as long as he wasn't carrying a weapon, he was murdered, plain and simple. If the government has contrary information, it would be nice if it laid out any allegations that it might have, clearly and openly.
Comments:
...where's brad supposed to be in the photo?
 
Well, I'm as puzzled as you, Nezua. Manuel's note was a bit cryptic. He said, "I am attaching two pictures. There is a person in common. Draw you own conclusions." The comparison photo, which I will have (about 10 minutes after this post) added above, seems to only have a tall gringo in common.

I have no idea what conclusion to draw, even if every person in the two photos were the same. But I suspect Manuel thinks the tall gringo is the same in both photos.

Your artist's eye may inform you. I'm baffled.
 
What the.

The only person I see in common is the guy in the brown cap and shades, who is pretty clearly not Brad Will, for obvious reasons.

Perhaps Manuel was going for guilt by association, since the guy was in the guerilla photo, and then calling for help in the next. But I'm pretty sure he's another photojournalist - his hands in the first photo are in camera-holding position, not gun-holding position, and I think that's his camera next to Will's head.

WTF is wrong with these people? Really. I guess the Rachel Corrie-style sick jokes are next, if they haven't started already.
 
Hm. Good point, Eli.

The guy in the brown cap in the first photo seemed to me more gringo, whereas in the second, the guy in the brown cap seems more definitely Mexican and not quite as lanky. I didn't think they were the same person-- tall Mexicans are still a rarity-- but they could be.
 
Post a Comment

<< Home

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

More blogs about politics.
Technorati Blog Finder